The Annapolis Summit: Israelis and Palestinians Shoot for the Moon
What’s the difference this time? Bush is pushing Israel and the Palestinians to agree, at least in principle, on a final peace treaty—or at least a “final status agreement”—even though fundamental issues such as security, the Palestinian refugees’ right of return, the fate of Jerusalem and Hamas’ control of the Gaza Strip are unresolved. Bush is looking for nothing short of a revolutionary agreement that would end 40 years of Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories and 60 years of Arab-Israeli conflicts.
The summit’s aims are as high as expectations are low. A deal between Israelis and Palestinians would be little short of miraculous. All the major negotiators and mediators are politically weak and internally divided, including the Bush administration. Even is a deal is struck in Annapolis, chances are dispiritingly low that it would be carried out without being hijacked by violent and unresolved realities on the ground, for many reasons.
For a complete briefing on the background, players, the issues and the bottom line of the Annapolis summit, see Shooting for the Palestinian-Israeli Moon.
See also:


Comments
The mighty champion has already fallen on his own sword: “We can’t impose our vision.” (GWB, today)
Why the hell not? This little dog-and-pony show may be good for keeping Arabs distracted, but the stakes of perpetuating it are hardly small. Heard of 911? Missing Russian nukes?
Shows you how much our elite actually cares about preventing terrorism…