Saddam Hussein Unplugged

Like hooded convicts: Fingerprints on Saddam Hussein's booking sheet (National Security Archives)
"Let me ask a direct question," Saddam Hussein said, in Arabic, at the beginning of one of his "interviews" by American interrogators in Baghdad on Feb. 13, 2004. "I want to ask where, from the beginning of this interview process until now, has the information been going? For our relationship to remain clear, I want to know." So Hussein was told: The U.S. government was doing the interviewing, and the information would likely lead back to George W. Bush.
Hussein seemed satisfied. Agreeable. Said he would have no reservations if others were "brought into" the process. He "does not mind" if the information is published. "If you decide to publish a book, be sure to write it in English as well as Arabic."
He spoke like his own publicist. He might as well have. He'll be the subject of his share of books, and in the next few days and weeks, more than his share of articles, now that the transcripts of 20 interviews and five "casual conversations" conducted with him after his capture by U.S. troops in December 2003 have been released, thanks to the always-industrious and fascinating National Security Archives at George Washington University.
"Saddam," the archives' own sum-up has it, "denied any connections to the 'zealot' Osama bin Laden, cited North Korea as his most likely ally in a crunch, and shared President George W. Bush's hostility towards the 'fanatic' Iranian mullahs, according to the FBI records of conversations from February through June 2004 between Saddam and Arabic-speaking agents in his detention cell at Baghdad International Airport."
It was for the Iranians' sake that he lied about possessing weapons of mass destruction. He feared them more than he feared the United States, so by pretending to have chemical weapons, he hoped to deter an Iranian attack.
From his last "casual conversation" with FBI agent George Piro, one of a scandalously small number of agents who spoke Arabic: "Hussein stated that he was a believer in God but was not a zealot." Hussein believed that religion and government should not mix."
Many of the interviews are searching, oral histories from Saddam Hussein's perspective of a range of matters--coups, the Palestinian-Israeli issue, wars with Israel, the Baath party in Iraq, his relationships with Syria and al-Qaeda--that will fill in his own perspective on Middle East history. But the documents are just as absorbing for the insights they allow about Saddam Hussein's mind at work, his personality, his strange mix of earnestness, clarity and delusions.
He was asked if, as often reported in the past, he had ever used doubles as security measures. "Movie magic," he called it, denying that he'd done so, except maybe when at war. But that's the thing: Iraq was in a virtual state of war for more years than not under Saddam.
"Not included in these FBI reports," the archives note, "are issues of particular interest to students of Iraq’s complicated relationship with the U.S. – the reported role of the CIA in facilitating the Ba’ath party’s rise to power, the uneasy alliance forged between Iraq and the U.S. during the Iran-Iraq war, and the precise nature of U.S. views regarding Iraq’s chemical weapons policy during that conflict, given its contemporaneous knowledge of their repeated use against Iranians and the Kurds." That's too bad: no word, for instance, on the Reagan administration's strategic alliance with Saddam against Iran.
"This series of interviews also does not address chemical warfare in Kurdish areas of Iraq in 1987-1988, although an FBI progress report says Saddam was questioned on the topic. One interview, #20, is redacted in its entirety on national security grounds, although it is not clear what issues agents could have discussed with Saddam that cannot now be disclosed to the public."
But we can guess. Ronald Reagan, Donald Rumsfeld and both Bushes must be breathing a sigh of relief, the redacting pen once again proving their questionable legacies' best friend.
Read the entire set of interviews and casual conversations at the National Security Archives.
See Also:


Comments
I just read ‘Saddam Hudein Unplugged’. I am sure there will be a lot of speculations going around about his so called interviews. People will write books and analyse. Me, being from Middle East, and following to the economic and political situations of different middle eastern countries, and digging around to find a reasonable explanation, yet I have to find, it saddens me to see the folly of the human stupidity. The West, from Alexander the ‘Great’ -he was not great but a rogue- has never understood the East. Is this intentionally done, or a mishap of the logic of western thinking.
I feel everything is marketable in the in the West. Even a fallen tyrant, and can be advertised to create more tyrants. What a mess.
Realities, truths can be presented in such a way to suit certain purpose of the interviewer. So for me it is such a shame that even a power like USA, does not have the courage to say the truth. If the US is really a power and pursuer of truth than why they didnot have the courage to treat the tyrant honourably and teaching a lesson to the world of generosity and magnanimity. Oh, the so called big power, is just a dwarf with soul and mind. Even sometimes I wonder if this country’s elite has a soul. May be someone has to start digging around in history, from the times of the fall of the Bagdad kingdom and a parallel history of the rise of western countries of the same time, to see where does this human animal is heading to.
Anyhow, these are few thoughts of mine. Somehow I feel sad.