1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Middle East Issues

NATO and US Troop Deployments & Casualties in Afghanistan

Mounting Costs of Operation Enduring Freedom

By , About.com Guide

In Afghanistan, US and NATO troops have surged, but so have casualties. U.S. Army Spc. Kevin Yeatman, 21, is out of breath after climbing a mountaintop overlooking a Taliban position October 28, 2008 in the Korengal Valley in eastern Afghanistan.

Photo by John Moore/Getty Images
Sep 27 2009

The grim numbers that used to attach to casualty reports from Iraq from 2004 to 2008 are now attaching to monthly reports from Afghanistan. At least 75 American and coalition soldiers were killed there in July (39 of them American, 22 British), by far the highest single-month tally since the Afghan war began in October 2001. The closest single-month figure to that toll was in June 2008, when 46 coalition soldiers were killed.

Since 2001, 759 American soldiers and 517 coalition soldiers have been killed for a total of 1,276. Added to the tally in Iraq, the two wars have now claimed 5,922 soldiers--a fraction of the number of Iraqi and Afghan civilians killed over the decade. But those comparisons have virtually no relevance when it comes to how the American or British public sees the wars, let alone how the two countries' respective political class sees them: Iraqi and Afghan civilians are, ironically, much more a concern to the military forces on the ground than they are either to the public or to politicians back home (to whom civilians might as well not exist).

In Britain, a majority of the British public thinks the Afghan war unwinnable. Most think even the ongoing assault in Helman Province, in the south of the country, is a lost cause despite the influx of thousands of fresh American troops.

On Aug. 16, 2009, the secretary general of NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, was compelled to release a statement on mounting casualties:

As NATO Secretary General, it is with great sadness that I recognise that over 200 brave and professional British servicemen and women have now lost their lives in Afghanistan.

I feel these losses keenly, as I feel the losses of other nations serving in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force. My thoughts go out to all the families affected, as does my gratitude to the troop contributing nations as a whole for the essential contribution they are making to the international effort in Afghanistan.

Here's a complete chart of US and NATO troops and their casualties in Afghanistan as of August 2009.

NATO and US Troops in Afghanistan

Rank Country # of Troops
as of 7/09
# of Casualties
as of 8/09
1 United States 64,000 782
2 United Kingdom 9,000 204
3 Germany 4,050 33
4 France 3,160 29
5 Canada 2,800 127
6 Italy 2,795 15
7 Poland 2,000 10
8 Netherlands 1,770 19
9 Australia 1,090 11
10 Romania 1,025 11
11 Spain 780 25
12 Turkey 730 2
13 Denmark 700 24
14 Belgium 510 0
15 Sweden 430 2
16 Norway 485 4
17 Bulgaria 470 0
18 Czech R. 340 3
19 Hungary 310 2
20 Croatia 295 0
21 Slovakia 230 0
22 Lithuania 200 1
23 Macedonia 165 0
23 Latvia 165 0
25 New Zealand 160 0
26 Estonia 150 4
27 Greece 145 0
28 Albania 140 0
29 Finland 110 1
30 Azerbaijan 90 0
30 Portugal 90 2
32 Slovenia 80 0
33 UAE 25 0
34 Ukraine 10 0
35 Luxemburg 9 0
36 Singapore 8 0
36 Iceland 8 0
38 Jordan 7 0
38 Ireland 7 0
40 Austria 3 0
41 Georgia 1 0
Totals: 98,543
1,311
Sources: NATO, icasualties.org

Explore Middle East Issues

About.com Special Features

Holiday Central

What to eat, where to go, fun things to do and how to save money on the perfect gifts. More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Middle East Issues
  4. Afghanistan
  5. NATO and US Troops Deployments & Casualties in Afghanistan - Chart of US Troops and NATO troops & Casualties in Afghanistan>

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.