Since it exploded on the world scene with the broadcast in 2004 of photographs of abuse and torture of inmates by U.S. soldiers and contractors, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal has mutated into several incarnations, some of them redeeming, most of them not: the scandal revealed a systemic failure of leadership, tactics and strategies in Iraq and Afghanistan. It discredited American credibility abroad and shattered Bush administration conceits at home. Now it's miring the Obama administration in a messy debate over whether to release more pictures. Here's a complete, updated guide to the multi-faceted issue.
Here are the actual photographs, including some of the most iconic, put in the context of what was taking place at the time--through the subsequent testimonies of the inmates who were tortured, the investigative reports of the American military, and reports of the Red Cross. Most of these photographs are from the original, 2004 disclosures of the Abu Ghraib torture scandal. Military intelligence forces told members of the Red Cross that between 70 percent and 90 percent of the inmates pictured here were arrested by mistake. Warning: not for delicate sensibilities.
It was long known, as told by Donald Rumsfeld, that the photographic record of abuse and torture images was larger than those disclosed in 2005. A court case instigated by the American Civil Liberties Union in 2004 led a federal district court to order the government to release all photographic and video evidence of inmate abuse and torture. The Appeals Court for the Second Circuit upheld the decision in September 2008. President Obama is resisting their release.
As a Senate Armed Services Committee inquiry concluded in December 2008, "The abuse of detainees in U.S. custody cannot simply be attributed to the actions of 'a few bad apples' acting on their own. The fact is that senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees. Those efforts damaged our ability to collect accurate intelligence that could save lives, strengthened the hand of our enemies, and compromised our moral authority."
the Army's Criminal Investigation Command took sworn statements from many individuals formerly imprisoned at Abu Ghraib prison. The most relevant testimonies are reproduced here, reflecting the the former inmates' original syntax and wording as rendered by military translators. The testimonies lend detailed, graphic explanations and some context for the scenes depicted in photographs of abuse and torture.
Should the Abu Ghraib images have been released? The question is pertinent even five years later, as the record of Abu Ghraib photographs is still incomplete. The Pentagon suppresses many additional photographs and videos that purportedly show more grave and degrading situations, including the rape and sodomy of inmates by American servicemen. Strong arguments are being made by proponents of disclosure. Less convincing arguments are being made by proponents of secrecy.
Reckoning with history is an American specialty. It's what enabled this country to own up to past atrocities, emerging stronger and better for it. Sanitizing history is the first rule of un-free nations. When government represses its own sinister past and gets away with it, the damage to a nation's character is more lasting than any terrorist act. Obama doesn't need the reminder. Yet his reversal on releasing remaining Abu Ghraib photos is Obama's most cynical decision to date, especially as he brandished for an excuse the emotionally potent but false pretense of soldiers' safety.
A Senate Armed Services Committee report explicitly rejects the Bush administration’s contention that tough interrogation methods have helped keep the country and its troops safe. The report also rejected previous claims by Donald Rumsfeld and others that Defense Department policies played no role in the the harsh treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in late 2003 and in other incidents of abuse.
Jane Mayer traces the ideological origins of the Bush administration's torture memos and Abu Ghraib scandals in riveting investigative detail and with the storytelling skills of an accomplished novelist. She shows how a few men--George Bush, Dick Cheney, a handful of lawyers--subverted the nation's laws and established a regime of torture, secret prisons and illegal detention to prosecute their "war on terror." The book provides invaluable context to the debate over torture.
Brief explanation and history of the notorious prison built in 1970 by Saddam Hussein, its many mutations down to the present, and the city that surrounds it and gage it is name.
In May 2009 Barack Obama announced that he would order the release of all remaining torture photos out of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. The decision wasn't his, but was compelled by a court case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. A few weeks later Obama reversed himself, claiming that releasing the photos would harm American soldiers in the field. But is Obama protecting soldiers or suppressing evidence with his flip-flop? Is he sanitizing the Bush years? Is he worried that releasing the photos would make evidence for a truth commission, which he's resisting, too powerful to ignore? You be the judge.
These sources were consulted to document and write about all materials relating to the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal and other matters relating to the treatment and mistreatment of inmates and detainees in the Bush and Obama administrations' prosecution of the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan or the Bush administration's "war on terror." The bibliography is also a helpful starting point for those interested in further reading. Where possible, documents are linked to their original web link in full.