Background to Cluelessness
Woodwards first two books, which dont make bad reading as background to Wrights, reflected the gullible mood Bush created on the ash-heap of 9/11 and abused to his administrations advantage until the summer of 2005, when Hurricane Katrina exploded the illusion.What were left with is a presidency less credible than any since Watergate, three wars ( Iraq, Afghanistan, terror), and a world more dangerous and a nation less safe than on 9/11. Judging from the polls, which still give Bush a roughly 30 percent approval, theres still an awful lot of denial going on despite Woodwards confessions. Meanwhile Osama is still vacationing somewhere in the Hindu Kush. Following Bushs lead, the rest of us still prefer to demonize him rather than study him. Not so Wright.
When Intelligence Trips Over Its Turfs
Wrights history draws two principal lessons. First, the 9/11 Commission underplayed how much the intelligence services were to blame for allowing 9/11 criminally so, if Wrights evidence is true. The CIA, the FBI and the National Security Agency each, on its own, had vital information (and photographs) about meetings, phone conversations and eventual hijackers travels and whereabouts.Those werent needles in haystacks that required leaps of imagination to connect. They were hard evidence the agencies refused to share; not because the law prevented them--thats a canard--but because turf battles amplified by personality conflicts and a clubbish culture got in the way. Judging from more recent reporting, little has changed. And neither the Patriot Act nor domestic spying gave intelligence and law enforcement tools they didnt already have to do their job without infringing on civil liberties, as those new laws do.
Bin Laden's "Brigade of the Ridiculous"
Second, al-Qaida is not much more than an assembly of rag-tag, fringe ideologies that barely have credit in the Islamic world. It isnt for nothing that in 1980s Afghanistan, the Arab fighters Osama cobbled together to fight the Soviets were called the "Brigade of the Ridiculous." They were useless then. Afghans scorned them.What successes they managed were entirely dependent on Osamas media savvy. None of the fighters, Osama among them, have ever had a clear idea of what theyre fighting for beyond sophomoric ideals about a golden-age caliphate. That caliphate has about as much credibility among Muslims as a return to the Confederate States of America has among Southerners.
Al-Qaeda's Hollow Ideological Core
President Bush, Karl Rove and other members of the administration, campaigning in the few places where Other Republicans would let them, have been talking up Osamas agenda by comparing it to Hitlers "Mein Kampf." The more fitting comparison is with "My So-Called Jihad."Have a listen: Heres how Osama responded when the journalist Peter Arnett asked him what kind of society he would create if he had his way in, say, Saudi Arabia: "We are confident, with the permission of God, praise and glory be upon him, that Muslims will be victorious in the Arabian Peninsula and that Gods religion, praise and glory be to him, will prevail in this peninsula. It is a great pride and a big hope that the revelation unto Mohammed, peace be upon him, will be resorted to for ruling. When we used to follow Mohammeds revelation, peace be upon him, we were in great happiness and in great dignity, to God belongs the credit and the praise."
Thats Saturday Night Live material, not the sort of thing an Islamic revolution can hang its sword on.



